You will need to supply the unit with 18.5V at no lees than 4.6 amps.
Anonymous
User login
Please support the defense of Ukraine.
Direct or via Unclutter App
Active forum topics
Recent content
Navigation
No Ads.
No Trackers.
No Social Media.
All Content Locally Hosted.
Built on Free Software.
We have complied with zero government requests for information.
hmm, so that means if one used a DC/DC supply, you would need about 8.5 amps at 12VDC to run one off your cars power. Assuming the supply was 80% efficient. So thats not to bad. The person doing it would need to make sure he/she uses proper guage wire so it doesnt get hot and cause a fire. The other way to do it would be to run an inverter to get 120VAC and use the standard power supply for it with a shortened cord. Still seems way overboard for a car hardware wise, but cant argue with the size.
G4 in a G5 Case: http://www.mlode.com/~stuka/g45/
iMac in FlexATX Case: http://www.mlode.com/~stuka/imac-atx/
I don't think this will be an option. The mac mini has a largish external power supply which you will probably need to run off an inverter. The power connector on the mac mini looks to be 10 conductors, probably 12VDC+/-, 5VDC+/-, 3.3VDC+/-, data+/data- to communicate to the brick when the machine is on/off/sleeping? I can't think of why you would need 10 conductors when you're doing internal regulation.
It seems Apple has learnt from the G4 Cube - Don't do voltage regulation inside a tiny box with the rest of the computer. The VRM board that turned the 28V input into 28, 12, 5 and 3.3V was one of the frequent causes of failure of the cubes.
Actually, this is a trend that's becoming more and more common industry wide. In order to reduce the amount of current passing through the circuit board, many companies are designing boards that accept only a single voltage input (usually 12V) and then regulate that down for each device as needed. I've got a server board at work with more than 15 regulators on it near each device and powered by a common 12V bus.
Get 'em while they're hot...
pictures of the Mac mini mobo:
http://www.macnews.de/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=16&page=2
This was a failure for upgraded cubes, not standard models. If you upgrade the processor, hard drive, and optical drive, then your really pushing the limits of the power board, which leads to failure. This is why cpu upgrades that are 1GHz and up all come with new power boards.
Seems like these guys think it can be done...
http://www.macworld.com/news/2005/01/14/macminiauto/index.php
Just curious where you got that spec . . .
dan k
I guess along with that, now would be the time to ask: Dr. Bob, were you still working at Apple when the mini was in the works? Did you have any involvement in the testing?
iBook 600,iMac 350 BB,UMAX c500/240,PM7100/66/G3-240,PCC PW120,512k, Plus,SE,SE FDHD,SE/30,IIsi,IIci/040,Q605,Q660/AV,Q700,Q800 PPC,P460,P475,LC 580,P5200 w/ 5500/250 MLB,PB165,PB150,Duo 280,Duo 280c&Dock II,PB 520c
Mac mini fund: $225
Picked up the power supply, looked at it.
The mini was on the drawing board but no protos were in test at the time that I quit.